Abstract With the increasing prevalence of information, communication and transport technology, mobility patterns of urban residents in modern society have become even more complex and diverse than before. Motility consists of a combination of geographical, social and cultural elements that influence individual mobility. The connotation reveals the dynamics and constraints of mobility within a social structure, while also emphasises the agency and ability of individuals to shape mobility. The concept of motility highlights the intrinsic value of mobility, which may contribute to personal growth and a meaningful life. Based on survey data collected from 10 communities in the main city area of Nanjing in 2019, we use multiple regression models to investigate the effects of different components of motility on wellbeing, including access, competence, and appropriation. And mediating effect analysis is used to investigate the relationship among social capital, motility and wellbeing. The findings suggest that motility contributes to residents' wellbeing significantly. More specifically, 1) Motility has a positive effect on both hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing, with a greater effect on the latter; 2) Access contributes more to wellbeing than the competence and appropriation dimensions. 3) Social capital has a significant mediating effect in the relationship between the variables of access and appropriation and wellbeing.
CHANG En-yu,ZHANG Min,CHEN Pei-pei. DECONSTRUCTING THE EFFECTS OF MOTILITY ON WELLBEING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF NANJING RESIDENTS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 38(6): 34-43,91.
Kwan M P, Schwanen T. Geographies of mobility[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2016,106(2):243-256.
[2]
Mokhtarian P L. Subjective well-being and travel:Retrospect and prospect[J]. Transportation, 2019,46(2):493-513.
[3]
De Vos J, Schwanen T, Van Acker V, et al. Travel and subjective well-being:A focus on findings, methods and future research needs[J]. Transport Reviews, 2013,33(4):421-442.
[4]
Reardon L, Abdallah S. Well-being and transport:Taking stock and looking forward[J]. Transport Reviews, 2013,33(6):634-657.
[5]
Hickman R, Cao M, Lira B M, et al. Understanding capabilities, functionings and travel in high and low income neighbourhoods in Manila[J]. Social Inclusion, 2017,5(4):161-174.
[6]
Kaufmann V, Bergman M M, Joye D. Motility:Mobility as capital[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004,28(4):745-756.
[7]
Urry J. Mobilities[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 2007:38-39.
[8]
Schwanen T, Nixon D V. Understanding the relationships between wellbeing and mobility in the unequal city:The case of community initiatives promoting cycling and walking in São Paulo and London//Keith M, de Souza Santos A A. Urban Transformations and Public Health in the Emergent City[M]. Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press, 2020:79-101.
[9]
Shliselberg R, Givoni M, Kaplan S. A behavioral framework for measuring motility:Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020,141:69-85.
[10]
Cuignet T, Perchoux C, Caruso G, et al. Mobility among older adults:Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement[J]. Urban Studies, 2020,57(2):383-401.
[11]
Cairns S, Harmer C, Hopkin J, et al. Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities:A review[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2014,63:107-117.
[12]
周红云.社会资本:布迪厄、科尔曼和帕特南的比较[J].经济社会体制比较,2003,19(4):46-53.[Zhou Hongyun. Social capital in Bourdieu's, Coleman's and Putnam's theory[J]. Comparative Economic&Social Systems, 2003,19(4):46-53.]
[13]
Currie G, Stanley J. Investigating links between social capital and public transport[J]. Transport Reviews, 2008,28(4):529-547.
[14]
Viry G, Kaufmann V, Widmer E D. Social integration faced with commuting:More widespread and less dense support networks[M]//Ohnmacht T, Maksim H, Bergman M M. Mobilities and Inequality. New York, USA:Routledge, 2009:121-143.
[15]
Stanley J K, Hensher D A, Stanley J R, et al. Mobility, social exclusion and well-being:Exploring the links[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2011,45(8):789-801.
[16]
Schwanen T, Lucas K, Akyelken N, et al. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015,74:123-135.
[17]
Shliselberg R, Givoni M. Motility as a policy objective[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018,38(3):279-297.
[18]
Kaufmann V, Audikana A. Handbook of Urban Mobilities[M]. New York, USA:Routledge, 2020:41-45.
[19]
Sheller M. Theorising mobility justice[J]. Tempo Social, 2018, 30(2):17-34.
[20]
唐香姐,徐红罡.大理打工旅游者的流动力研究[J].旅游学刊, 2019,34(10):137-146.[Tang Xiangjie, Xu Honggang. Study on the motility of working tourists in Dali, Yunnan[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019,34(10):137-146.]
[21]
Kaufmann V, Dubois Y, Ravalet E. Measuring and typifying mobility using motility[J]. Applied Mobilities, 2018,3(2):198-213.
[22]
De Witte A, Hollevoet J, Dobruszkes F, et al. Linking modal choice to motility:A comprehensive review[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2013,49:329-341.
[23]
Atkinson S. Beyond components of wellbeing:The effects of relational and situated assemblage[J]. Topoi, 2013,32(2):137-144.
[24]
Diener E, Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985,49(1):71-75.
[25]
Ryff C D, Singer B H. Know thyself and become what you are:A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2008,9(1):13-39.
[26]
Olsson L E, Gärling T, Ettema D, et al. Happiness and satisfaction with work commute[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2013,111(1):255-263.
[27]
赵延东,罗家德.如何测量社会资本:一个经验研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2005,28(2):18-24.[Zhao Yandong, Luo Jiade. How to measure social capital:A review of empirical studies[J]. Social Sciences International, 2005,28(2):18-24.]
[28]
Stanley J K, Hensher D A, Stanley J R, et al. Mobility, social exclusion and well-being:Exploring the links[J], Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2011,45(8):789-801.
[29]
Bergstad C J, Gamble A, Gärling T, et al. Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel[J]. Transportation, 2011,38(1):1-15.
[30]
Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[31]
刘晔,肖童,刘于琪,等.城市建成环境对广州市居民幸福感的影响——基于15min步行可达范围的分析[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(8):1270-1282.[Liu Ye, Xiao Tong, Liu Yuqi, et al. Impacts of urban built environments on residents'subjective well-being:An analysis based on 15-minute walking distance[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(8):1270-1282.]
[32]
温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.[Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Analyses of mediating effects:The development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014,22(5):731-745.]
[33]
Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable[J]. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2014,67(3):451-470.
[34]
De Vos J, Witlox F. Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2017,106:364-373.
[35]
Abou-Zeid M, Ben-Akiva M. Well-being and activity-based models[J]. Transportation, 2012,39(6):1189-1207.
[36]
Son J, Wilson J. Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well-being[J]. Sociological Forum, 2012,27(3):658-681.
[37]
常恩予,张敏.西方流动性研究与交通地理学的对话:进展、启示与展望[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(8):1516-1529.[Chang Enyu, Zhang Min.Mobility studies and transport geography in the West:Progress, implications and prospects[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022,41(8):1516-1529.]
[38]
熊伟,黄媚娇,蔡晓梅,等.新流动范式下非流动性的研究进展与展望[J].地理研究,2022,41(3):748-763.[Xiong Wei, Huang Meijiao, Cai Xiaomei, et al. Immobility under the new flow paradigm:Research progress and future prospect[J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(3):748-763.]
